172 N.J. Super. 592 - Ezzi v. De Laurentis’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 2017
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Borough of Matawan v. Monmouth County Board of Taxation · 129 N.J. Super. 192 - Markey v. Skog · 130 N.J. Super. 450 - Dambro v. Union Cty. Pk. Comm. · McGlone v. Corbi · 139 N.J. Super. 342 - Anske v. Borough of Palisades Park
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A claim relating to a cause of action for death or for injury to person or to property shall be presented as provided in this chapter not later than the ninetieth day after accrual of the cause of action. After the expiration of 6 month from the date notice of claim is received, the claimant may file suit in an appropriate court of law. The claimant shall be forever barred from recovering against a public entity if: a. He failed to file his claim with the public entity within 30 days of accrual of his claim except as otherwise provided in section 59:8-9; or b. Two years have elapsed since the accrual of the claim; ____”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Berretta v. Cannon“A dismissal without prejudice unfortunately creates problems of its own. In the present setting the suit will presumably continue as between plaintiff and defendant and discovery will proceed over the next six months, despite the nonparticipation of a party in interest. Once the municipality is rejoined, it will not be bound by prior discovery and duplication may occur. At the very least, the main action will probably be delayed. ’ On the other hand, these potential problems do not compel a conclusion that compliance with the statute in this setting serves no legislative purpose.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Berretta v. Cannon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.