Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 172 Ohio App. 3d 780 - State v. Strozier

172 Ohio App. 3d 780 - State v. Strozier’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

103
cited by 103 later decisions
3
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

102 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 103 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably State v. Smith (2016), State v. Ferrell (2017)

102 state decisions

830200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · United States v. Mendenhall · Rhode Island v. Innis · Berkemer v. McCarty

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 103 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'Interrogation' includes express questioning as well as 'any words or actions on the part of the police (other than those normally attendant to arrest and custody) that the police should know are reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response from the suspect.' " State v. Strozier , 172 Ohio App.3d 780 , 2007-Ohio-4575 , 876 N.E.2d 1304 , ¶ 20 (2d Dist.), quoting Rhode Island v. Innis , 446 U.S. 291 , 301, 100 S.Ct. 1682 , 64 L.Ed.2d 297 (1980). "Interrogation”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a measure of compulsion above and beyond that inherent in custody itself.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[a]n individual is subject to an investigatory detention when, in view of all the circumstances surrounding the incident, by means of physical force or show of authority, a reasonable person would have believed that he was not free to leave or is compelled to respond to questions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.