Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 291

Johnson v. Eckle

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1961

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1961-05-31

Decided 1961-05-31

Per Curiam.

¶1A parole violator is not entitled to credit for the period of his declared violations. Consequently, petitioner has not served the maximum sentence imposed and, therefore, is not entitled to his release by habeas corpus.

¶2Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Radcliee and O’Neill, JJ., concur.Radcliee, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J.
/172/ohiost(ns)/291 · .json · Public domain