Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 293

Baker v. Sacks

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1961

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1961-05-31

Decided 1961-05-31

Per Curiam.

¶1Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence to review the alleged irregularities and errors of which he here complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.

¶2Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Radcliee and O’Neill, JJ., concur.Radcliee, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J.
/172/ohiost(ns)/293 · .json · Public domain