Baker v. Sacks

Decided June 14, 1961

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1961-06-14

Decided 1961-06-14

Per Curiam.

¶1Habeas corpus cannot be used to review alleged irregularities in the resentencing of an accused by a court of competent jurisdiction. Ex parte Shaw, 7 Ohio St., 81; Ex parte Hagan, 25 Ohio St., 426.

¶2Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, Bell, Radcliee and O’Neill, JJ., concur.Radcliee, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J.