Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 172 Okla. 342 - Sam v. Sam

Sam v. Sam’s Empirical Analysis

1935

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
September 1990
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently September 1990

19 state decisions

601935194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lincoln v. French · Boulden v. McIntire · Nixon v. Wichita Land and Cattle Co. · Teter v. Teter · Bilby v. Stewart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “has the same power to decide the questions of fact which the county court or judge had, and it may, in its discretion, as in suits in chancery, and with like effect, make an order for the trial by jury of any or all the material questions of fact arising upon the issues between the parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.