Roetzel v. Rusch’s Empirical Analysis
1935
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 2011
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson-Prichard Oil Corp. v. Keyokla Oil Co. · Stanfield v. Lincoln
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The location does not rest upon 'acquiescence in an erroneous boundary, but upon .the fact that the true location was made. * * *»”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““4. Where a deed describes property by reference to plat or map, grantee takes title in accordance with the boundary so identified; but where discrepancy exists between call in deed for monuments and courses and distances shown by plat referred to, general rule that monuments control courses and distances will be followed.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Scarberry v. Carr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.