Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 172 Okla. 85 - Davis v. Manhard

Davis v. Manhard’s Empirical Analysis

1935

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 2023

16 state decisions

601935194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sharon v. Tucker · Flesher v. Callahan · Caldwell v. Scivally · Lackey v. Wagner · Sanders v. Leforce

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A deed by a grantor out of possession of real property who has not been in possession for a year next preceding date of conveyance, or has not within a year taken rents and profits, or those under whom he claims, is void as against any person or persons in adverse possession. “Where the holder of the legal title to real estate, who is out of possession, convoys such title to a third person who is not in possession, in contemplation of law, as between the grantor, grantee, and the person in possession, holding adversely, claiming to be the owner thereof, the title remains in the grantor or original proprietor, and the person in possession has a right to purchase in such title, from the original owner, for the purpose of perfecting his title after said owner has attempted to convey said property to another, as said attempted conveyance is champertous.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““ ‘Adverse possession’ means open, continuous, and exclusive possession with claim of ownership, such as will notify parties seeking information on subject that premises are not held in subordination to any title or claim of others, but against all titles and claimants.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.