Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 172 Or. App. 142 - State v. Maxwell

172 Or. App. 142 - State v. Maxwell’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
4
states following
January 2020
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Texas v. New Mexico · United States v. Watson · Woodruff v. State · State v. Rogers · United States v. Dotson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"(1) The credibility of a witness may be attacked or supported by evidence in the form of opinion or reputation, but: "(a) The evidence may refer only to character for truthfulness or untruthfulness; and "(b) Evidence of truthful character is admissible only after the character of the witness for truthfulness has been attacked by opinion or reputation evidence or otherwise. "(2) Specific instances of the conduct of a witness, for the purpose of attacking or supporting the credibility of the witness, other than conviction of crime as provided in [ OEC 609 ], may not be proved by extrinsic evidence. Further, such specific instances of conduct may not, even if probative of truthfulness or untruthfulness, be inquired into on cross-examination of the witness."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “An abuse of discretion on an evidentiary ruling by a trial court occurs when the court's ruling exceeds the range of all legally correct discretionary choices. In that context, 'discretion' refers to the authority of the trial court to choose among several legally correct outcomes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “in the discretion of the trial court, the contacts on which the opinion is based are frequent enough and recent enough to have probative value to the testimony given in court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.