Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 172 P3D 701 - Ross v. Kirner

Ross v. Kirner’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently January 2024

16 state decisions

140200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 124 Wash. 2d 158 - Havens v. C & D PLASTICS, INC. · 122 Wash. 2d 371 - Yakima County (West Valley) Fire Protection District No. 12 v. City of Yakima · Trimble v. Washington State University · ESCA Corp. v. KPMG Peat Marwick · Osborn v. Mason County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the defendant supplied information for the guidance of others in their business transactions that was false, (2) the defendant knew or should have known that the information was supplied to guide the plaintiff in his business transactions, (3) the defendant was negligent in obtaining or communicating the false information, (4) the plaintiff relied on the false information, (5) the plaintiff's reliance was reasonable, and (6) the false information proximately caused the plaintiff damages.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “); Ross v. Ticor Title Ins. Co., 135 Wash.App. 182, 190 , 143 P.3d 885 (2006) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.