Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 172 SO 367 - MacLehan v. Loft Candy Stores, Inc.

MacLehan v. Loft Candy Stores, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 2015

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions

50193719401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kellogg Bridge Co. v. Hamilton · Doyle v. Fuerst & Kraemer, Ltd. · George v. Shreveport Cotton Oil Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is an implied warranty in every sale. The vendor guarantees the vendee against the hidden defects of the thing sold. R.C.C. arts. 1764, 2520, et seq.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.