Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 172 SW2D 526 - Winn v. Warner

Winn v. Warner’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2006
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 38 Tex. Civ. App. 165 - Houston & Texas Central Railroad Co. v. Buchanan · Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. Watson · Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Parrish · St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. Hill Bros. · Dees v. Thomason

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[p]erhaps the most universally hated character in the world today. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “calculated to arouse the deepest prejudice on the part of the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.