Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 172 SW3D 838 - State v. Miller

State v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Faught Ex Rel. Faught v. Washam · Tune v. Synergy Gas Corp. · State v. Flynn · State v. Lyons · State v. Farris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] motion in limine is interlocutory in nature and, by itself, preserves nothing for appeal. At trial, Appellant testified about her injuries and introduced photos of them. The State did not object to any of this evidence. Although she argues that “she was prohibited from corroborating this testimony and evidence with medical evidence to support her claim,” she fails to direct us to any portion of the record, other than the interlocutory order in limine, where she attempted to introduce any additional evidence or made offers of proof about the same. As a result, Appellant has preserved nothing for our review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “by exerting the strength and power of his bodily muscles to overcome [the officer's] attempts to pull him from the car”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.