Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 172 U.S. 416 - Utter v. Franklin

Utter v. Franklin’s Empirical Analysis

172 U.S. 416 · 1899

Citation profile

114
cited by 114 later decisions
16
cited 16 times by the Supreme Court
16
states following
October 1993
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 62 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 114 later decisions (16 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1993 · most notably United States v. Conrad Heinszen C (1907), Charles Simms v. Hannah T Simms (1899)

13 federal appellate · 62 state decisions — followed in 16 states

26018991900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The American Insurance Company v. 356 Bales of Cotton David Canter · National Bank v. County of Yankton · Board of Sup'rs of Grenada Co v. Brown · New Orleans v. Clark · Anderson v. Township of Santa Anna in De Witt Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 114 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he fact that this court had held the original Pima county bonds invalid does not affect the question. They were invalid because there was no power to issue them. They were made valid by such power being subsequently given, and it makes no possible difference that they had been declared to be void under the power originally given. The judgment in that case was res judicata only of the issues then presented, of the facts as they then appeared, and of the legislation then existing.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.