172 Wash. 2d 438 - State v. Thorgerson’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
49
cited by 49 later decisions
1
states following
November 2024
most recently cited
49 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 125 Wash. 2d 24 - State v. Russell · State v. Stenson · State v. Hoffman · 114 Wash. 2d 613 - State v. Swan · State v. Pirtle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“56 To prevail on a claim of prosecutorial misconduct, the defendant bears the burden of establishing that the conduct was both improper and prejudicia1.57 To establish prejudice, the defendant must show”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“'no curative instruction would have obviated any prejudicial effect on the jury'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“failure to object to an improper remark constitutes a waiver of error unless the remark is so flagrant and ill intentioned that it causes an enduring and resulting prejudice that could not have been neutralized by an admonition to the jury:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.