Stedman v. Cooper’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 87 Wash. 2d 922 - Johnson v. Morris · State v. Yates · 28 Wash. App. 737 - Batten v. Abrams · Tittsworth v. Robinson · Kim v. Pham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“his clear message was that [the plaintiff] could not have been injured in the accident because the force of the impact was too small”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“'[t]he broad standard of abuse of discretion means that courts can reasonably reach different conclusions about whether, and to what extent, an expert's testimony will be helpful to the jury in a particular case'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“disavowed any intention of giving an opinion about whether [the plaintiff] got hurt in the accident”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cooper v. Thompson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.