Klitzke v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
1920
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 1985
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Falkner v. Schultz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ... It is well settled that in this class of cases the amount of damages is a subject peculiarly in the province of the jury. On the motion for a new trial the circuit judge declined to reduce the verdict. We cannot say . . . that the discretion of the circuit -judge . . . was not properly exercised.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wallin v. Sutherland“usual elements of damages in actions of this character”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.