Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 172 WIS 425 - Klitzke v. Davis

Klitzke v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1920

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 1985
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Falkner v. Schultz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ... It is well settled that in this class of cases the amount of damages is a subject peculiarly in the province of the jury. On the motion for a new trial the circuit judge declined to reduce the verdict. We cannot say . . . that the discretion of the circuit -judge . . . was not properly exercised.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “usual elements of damages in actions of this character”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.