Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 173 ALA 205 - Newell v. Manley

Newell v. Manley’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2006
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 2006

5 state decisions

201911192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on George E. Wood Lumber Co. v. Williams · Whittaker v. Van Hoose · Lawrence v. Alabama State Land Co. · Belcher v. Scruggs · Dickinson v. Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The [plaintiff] does not have to prove his title at all, and if he is in peaceable possession the sole inquiry is whether the [defendant] has proved any title in himself.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.