Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 173 ALA 500 - Farr v. Perkins

Farr v. Perkins’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
March 1983
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently March 1983 · most notably Crawford v. Carlisle (1921), Braley v. Spragins (1930)

26 state decisions

8019111920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sharp v. Hall · Horton v. Sledge · Daniel v. Hill · Newell v. Woodruff · Hall v. Burkham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * that my said wife, Sarah, shall have a life estate and interest in said lands first; then said lands to descend and be inherited and enjoyed by our youngest son then alive and his lawful children. But in case of his death without lawful children, the residue or remainder interest to descend and be enjoyed by my next youngest son then alive and his lawful children forever, and in the event of the death of all my sons during the life of my wife, Sarah, then I give my said lands to my said daughter then living and to her heirs forever.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “sons (of whom there were three) without surviving children lawfully begotten,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “to him and to his lawful heirs or children forever.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.