State v. Morris’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably State v. Forant (1998), State v. Lindsley (1997)
34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Merrill · State v. Phillips · State v. Whitaker · State v. Wideman · State v. Dillon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Economic loss” means any loss incurred by a person as a result of the commission of an offense. Economic loss includes lost interest, lost earnings and other losses which would not have been incurred but for the offense. Economic loss does not include losses incurred by the convicted person, damages for pain and suffering, punitive damages or consequential damages.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sexton · State v. Lindsley“Consequential damages are such as are not produced without the concurrence of some other event attributable to the same origin or cause; such damage, loss, or injury as does not flow directly and immediately from the action of the party, but only from the consequences or results of such act. The term may include damage which is so remote as not to be actionable.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sexton · State v. Slover“[Djamages in satisfaction of, or in recompense for, loss or injury sustained; such compensation or damages for an injury as follow from the nature and character of the act, and will put the injured party in the position which he was in before he was injured. 25 C.J.S. Damages § 2 at 615 (1966).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sexton · State v. Barrett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.