Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 173 Ariz. 282 - State v. Barnett

State v. Barnett’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Henderson v. Kibbe · Sims v. Central Intelligence Agency · State v. Girdler · State v. Martin · State v. Holder

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the statute requires something more substantial than the momentary restraint that occurred in this case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[t]here was no testimony that the victim was ever rendered groggy and disoriented”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “whether the victim's capacity to resist was substantially impaired.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.