Aboud v. DeConcini’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Relies on United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America · Polk v. Koerner · Henderson v. Jacobs · Contempo Construction Co. v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. · Contempo Const. v. MT. STATES T. & T. CO.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In interpreting a contract, the court must ascertain and give effect to the intention of the parties at the time it was made, if at all possible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.