Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 173 Ark. 120 - Gower v. Johnson

Gower v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1927

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
February 2003
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 2003

18 state decisions

120192719301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Walsh v. Mayer · Storey v. Looney · Hill v. Williams · Bland v. Benton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The judgment of the circuit court was correct. Under our previous decisions construing our primary election statute, the right to contest a primary election is a statutory proceeding, the purpose of which is to furnish a summary remedy and to secure a speedy trial. The provision requiring the contest to be filed within ten days has been held to be mandatory and jurisdictional. If the contest is not filed within ten days after certification of the nomination complained of, the failure to institute the contest within that time is fatal to the right of the contestant. Hill v. Williams, 165 Ark. 421 , 264 S.W. 964 , and Storey v. Looney, 165 Ark. 455 , 265 S.W. 51 . As was said by the Supreme Court of the United States in Walsh v. Mayer, 111 U.S. 31 : “The provisions requiring it to be asserted in a particular mode and within a fixed time are conditions and qualifications attached to the right itself, and do not form part of the law of the remedy. If it is not asserted within the limited period, it ceases to exist, and cannot be claimed or enforced in any form.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.