Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 173 CALAPP2D 721 - People v. Cummings

People v. Cummings’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 2018

14 state decisions

1001959196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Gallardo · People v. Brown · People v. Steccone · People v. Weiss · People v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “misjoinder is not one of the grounds upon which the information may be attacked under section 995 of the Penal Code. That objection to the information may be only raised by demurrer ( Pen. Code, § 1004, subd. 3 ).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.