¶1Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
¶2Motion to amend mandate.
¶3For opinion below, see 170 Fed. 928.
¶4Before LACOMBE and NOYES, Circuit Judges.
¶6The decision in The Express, 59 Fed. 476, 8 C. C. A. 182, applies. In the first of'the above causes the interest to which libelant is entitled should be paid by the interests which, by appealing, tied up the litigation. In the second cause no interest should be allowed upon that part of the decree payable by the Matthews. We are not inclined to allow the claim for premiums paid on account of the stipulations for value. The decrees may be amended accordingly.