Sanger v. Rovello

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided December 7, 1909.)

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1909-12-07

<p>In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1913

1 federal appellate ·

1 counsel of record

Relies on 46 Tex. Civ. App. 38 - Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Wilson Hack Line · 46 Tex. Civ. App. 26 - McClelland v. McClelland

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1909-12-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas.

¶2H. O. Lindsey, for plaintiff in error! Bíchard I. Munroe and J. B. Downs, for defendants in error.

¶3Before PAK-DEE, McCOBMIOK, and SHELBY, Circuit Judges.

¶4PEB CURIAM.

¶5The plaintiff in error took no better title to the property purchased at execution sale than Peter McClellan had; and said Peter McClellan, as appears by the record, had no title subject to execution, as settled in the courts of the state of Texas long prior to plaintiff in error’s purchase. See McClelland v. McClelland (Tex. Civ. App.) 37 S. W. 350; Wood v. McClelland (Tex. Civ. App.) 53 S. W. 381; McClelland v. McClelland, 46 Tex. Civ. App. 26, 101 S. W. 1171. The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.