Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 173 F.2d 204 - Tsang v. Kan

Tsang v. Kan’s Empirical Analysis

173 F.2d 204 · 1949

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 2014

9 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

4019491950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act)

Relies on Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp. · Healy Nh v. Ratta · General Inv Co v. Lake Shore & M S Ry Co · Claflin v. Houseman · Ames v. State of Kansas Johnston Kansas Pac Ry Co

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.