¶1Charles Cantrell, -in pro. per.
¶2Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., of Florida and Reeves Bowen, Asst. Atty. Gen., of Florida, for respondent.
¶3Before SIBLEY, McCORD and WALLER, Circuit Judges.
¶5The applicant for the writ of habeas corpus not having exhausted his remedies in the State courts, the District Judge properly declined to interfere. Ex parte Hawk, 321 U.S. 114, 116, 64 S.Ct. 448, 88 L.Ed. 572; Wade v. Mayo, 334 U.S. 672, 681, 68 S.Ct. 1270.
¶6Judgment affirmed.