Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 173 F.2d 346 - United States v. Lowe

United States v. Lowe’s Empirical Analysis

173 F.2d 346 · 1949

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
June 1980
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1980

9 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

6019491950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Burns v. United States · United States v. Norstrand Corp. · Shiflett v. Welch · Bertrand v. Ragen · United States v. Lowe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We hold that a charge that a bargain had been made between the defendant’s attorney and the Assistant United States Attorney — a charge that was never asserted at the time of the hearing before Judge Clancy nor apparently for over a year thereafter' — which was neither verified nor supported in any way by the arguments submitted * * * was insufficient to require Judge Medina to grant the defendant’s motion. We think the charge was evidently a mere afterthought. Had it any substance, the defendant would have protested at his sentence when it was imposed, and then and there have sought to withdraw his plea and to go on trial on the merits.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.