Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

173 F.2d 747

Docket No. 12168.

Daugharty v. United States

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 1949.

As Amended on Denial of Rehearing April 8, 1949.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1949-03-30

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1949-03-30

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2009

5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

1001949195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Bailey Lang and Alfred Hampson, Jr., both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

¶2John A. Carver, U. S. Atty. and Paul S. Boyd and Sherman F. Furey, Jr., Asst. U. S. Attys., all of Boise, Idaho, for appellee.

¶3Before MATHEWS, HEALY and BONE, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5In the United States District Court for the District of Idaho, appellant, Clifford Daugharty, was indicted for violating § 3 of the National Stolen Property Act, as amended, 18 U.S.C.A. § 415 [now § 2314], The indictment was in 13 counts. Appellant was arraigned and pleaded guilty to each count of the indictment. Thereupon, on May 13, 1947, the District Court entered a judgment sentencing appellant to be imprisoned for five years and six months. From that judgment no appeal was taken.

¶6On November 22, 1948, appellant petitioned the District Court to vacate and set aside the judgment of May 13, 1947. On November 30, 1948, the District Court entered an order denying the petition. This appeal is from that order.

¶7Appellee, the United States, has moved to dismiss the appeal as being frivolous. We have examined the record and find that the appeal is frivolous. It is therefore dismissed.

/173/f2d/747 · .json · Public domain