Csatari v. General Finance Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
173 F.2d 798 · 1949
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2283
Relies on Pepper v. Litton · Local Loan Co. v. Hunt · Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co. · Toucey v. New York Life Insurance · Irving Trust Company v. Bowditch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * State procedure was available to the appellants to review the ruling of the City Court of which complaint is made in the present action. No appeal was taken. * * * Until some satisfactory reason is shown for not using the available state procedure, we find no reason to interfere with the state processes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.