¶1See 69 S.Ct. 1165.
¶2James Albert D’Ostroph, pro se.
¶3Sam M. Wear, U. S. Atty., of Kansas City, Mo., for appellee.
¶5Appeal from District Court, 7 F.R.D. 569, dismissed.
173 F.2d 897
Docket No. 13812.
Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1949-03-10
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 1967
4 federal appellate ·
2 counsel of record
Relies on D'Ostroph v. Pescor
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1949-03-10
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1See 69 S.Ct. 1165.
¶2James Albert D’Ostroph, pro se.
¶3Sam M. Wear, U. S. Atty., of Kansas City, Mo., for appellee.
¶5Appeal from District Court, 7 F.R.D. 569, dismissed.