173 F.2d 899
Docket No. 3844.
Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals
Decided Feb. 24, 1949.
Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1949-02-24
2 counsel of record
Relies on 75 F. Supp. 871 - Flackman v. Hunter
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1949-02-24
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 1986
2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Harry W. Bowles and L. Berwyn Ull-strom, both of Denver, Colo., for appellant.
¶2Lester Luther, U. S. Atty., and Eugene W. Davis, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Topeka, Kan., and Lieutenant Colonel Nicholas R. Voorhis, Judge Advocate General’s Office, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
¶3Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and SYMES, District Judge.
¶5Appeal, 75 F.Supp. 871, dismissed on motion of appellant.