Small v. Schultz’s Empirical Analysis
173 F.2d 940 · 1949
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
3
states following
January 1952
most recently cited
10 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 15 (§ 4 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914)
Relies on Turner Glass Corp. v. Hartford-Empire Co. · Bowles v. Krodel · Leibman v. Siegel · Fleming v. Gordon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.