Jake v. Gl Herschberger’s Empirical Analysis
173 F.3d 1059 · 1999
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably Aycox v. Lytle (1999), Francisco Rios v. Ron Wiley Ron Wiley (2000)
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anders v. California · United States v. Wilson · Ponzi v. Fessenden · United States v. Aleman · United States v. Myers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The state court's designation of [the defendant's] state sentence as concurrent with his prior federal sentence created no obligation on the Attorney General to provide him with credit for time served in the state prison.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Leal v. Tombone“record [was] unclear one way or the other”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.