Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 173 F.3d 1278 - Rogers v. Gibson

Rogers v. Gibson’s Empirical Analysis

173 F.3d 1278 · 1999

Citation profile

162
cited by 162 later decisions
June 2017
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 162 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably Victor Wayne Hooks v. Ron Ward (1999), Dion Smallwood v. Gary Gibson Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma - (1999)

28 federal appellate · 3 district ·

1330199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Coleman v. Thompson · Burks v. United States · Lindh v. Murphy · Caldwell v. Mississippi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 162 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a defendant cannot be expected to comply with a procedural rule that did not exist at the time of the purported default,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “In all cases in which a state prisoner has defaulted his federal claims in state court pursuant to an independent and adequate state procedural rule, federal habeas review of the claims is barred unless the prisoner can demonstrate cause for the default and actual prejudice as a result of the alleged violation of federal law, or demonstrate that failure to consider the claims will result in a fundamental miscarriage of justice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.