United States v. Bradley’s Empirical Analysis
173 F.3d 225 · 1999
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 5 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably State v. Sanders (2001), United States v. Kemp (2007)
15 federal appellate · 5 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Evans v. United States · McCormick v. United States · United States v. Bertoli · United States v. Console · United States v. Zehrbach
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an explicit promise to perform the official acts in return for payment is not required,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“knowing the payment was made in return for official acts”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a conclusion that in a Hobbs Act case the government has to demonstrate that the public official made an express promise to perform a particular act and that `knowing winks and nods' are not sufficient would frustrate the [Hobbs A]ct's effect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.