Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 173 FRD 689 - Lisseveld v. Marcus

Lisseveld v. Marcus’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
January 1998
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1121 (§ 39 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (§ 43 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 28 U.S.C. § 1338 · 28 U.S.C. § 1391

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson · Hanson v. Denckla · Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.