Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 173 Ga. App. 127 - Hubbard v. State

173 Ga. App. 127 - Hubbard v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2018

11 state decisions

401984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dingler v. State · Patterson v. State · Smith v. State · 146 Ga. App. 439 - Leonard v. State · Jackson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when a defendant voluntarily takes the stand in his own behalf and testifies as to his guilt or innocence as to a particular offense, his waiver [of the right against self-incrimination] is not partial; having once cast aside the cloak of immunity, he may not resume it at will, whenever cross-examination may be inconvenient or embarrassing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “'[W]hen a witness declines to answer on cross-examination certain pertinent questions relevant to a matter testified about by the witness on direct examination, all of the witness' testimony on the same subject matter should be stricken.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[g]iven the absence of any indication that the state's expert was incompetent or biased or that the chemical analysis performed by him might otherwise be unreliable”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.