Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 173 Ga. App. 348 - Doby v. State

173 Ga. App. 348 - Doby v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
April 2005
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 2005

11 state decisions

90198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Hicks v. State · Cape v. State · 159 Ga. App. 326 - Gilbert v. State · 153 Ga. App. 769 - Burke v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Failure to object to the in-court identification at trial forecloses appellate review of the matter. [Cit.]” Doby v. State, 173 Ga. App. 348, 350 (5) ( 326 SE2d 506 ) (1985). See also Reynolds v. State, 168 Ga. App. 555, 556 (2) ( 309 SE2d 867 ) (1983); May v. State, 159 Ga. App. 565, 566 (2) ( 284 SE2d 70 ) (1981); Respess v. State, 145 Ga. App. 570 (2) ( 244 SE2d 251 ) (1978).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.