Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 173 Ill. 2d 1 - People v. Redd

173 Ill. 2d 1 - People v. Redd’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

91
cited by 91 later decisions
2
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

90 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 91 later decisions — most recently December 2025 · most notably 185 Ill. 2d 81 - People v. Kliner (1998), 193 Ill. 2d 306 - People v. Williams (2000)

90 state decisions

2701996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Faretta v. California · Woodson v. North Carolina · McKaskle v. Wiggins · 122 Ill. 2d 176 - People v. Enoch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 91 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`subpoena each and every witness he may want to and put anybody at all on the witness stand'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] movant has the responsibility to obtain a ruling from the court on his motion to avoid waiver on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In Re MR
  3. “directly acknowledge his commission of the offenses”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.