Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

173 Ill. App. 664

Goldstein v. Muller

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 9, 1912

Appellate Court of Illinois · decided 1912-12-09

<p>Appeals and ekroes—motion to dismiss. A motion to dismiss a writ of error, sued out more than thirty days after the judgment, will he granted.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1913

1 state decisions

Relies on Novelty Tufting Machine Co. v. Peters & Roberts Furniture Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Writ of error dismissed · Decided 1912-12-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1June 24, 1912, we reserved until the hearing a motion made by the defendant in error to dismiss the writ of error in this cause because sued out more than thirty days after the judgment. We have now taken the cause into consideration and determined that we must grant the motion, for the reasons set forth in the opinion in Novelty Tufting Machinery Company v. The Peters & Roberts Furniture Company, 170 Ill. App. 134. The writ of error is therefore dismissed.

¶2Writ of error dismissed.

/173/illapp/664 · .json · Public domain