Baksinski v. Corey’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 105 Ill. 2d 336 - City of Springfield v. Board of Election Commissioners of Springfield · 93 Ill. 2d 208 - Schutzenhofer v. Granite City Steel Co. · 11 Ill. 2d 456 - Pliakos v. Illinois Liquor Control Commission · 39 Ill. App. 3d 419 - Johnson v. City of Evanston · 7 Ill. App. 3d 338 - Reardon v. Ford Motor Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Any class member seeking to be excluded from a class action may request such exclusion and any judgment entered in the action shall not apply to persons who properly request to be excluded.” Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 110, par. 2 — 804(b).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Baksinski v. Corey““May a defendant class representative ‘opt out,’ that is, petition for exclusion from the putative class pursuant to section 2 — 804 of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Baksinski v. Corey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.