Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 173 IND 296 - Heath v. State

Heath v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1910

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
7
states following
February 2000
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 65 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently February 2000 · most notably Perfect v. State (1923), Barker v. State (1918)

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 65 state decisions

1901910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cooper v. State · Sage v. State · People v. McNulty · Donovan v. State · Reed v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . The girl’s appearance and misrepresentation of her age, and his good-faith belief that she was above the age of consent, could have no weight upon the question of guilt or innocence, although they might, under the old procedure, go in mitigation of the penalty. The law absolutely forbids carnal intercourse with a child under fourteen years of age, and no belief respecting the age of the girl, however well founded, will excuse the transgressor, if at the time of the sexual act she is, in fact, within the prohibited age. . . .””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““. . . declarative of the continuing policy of the State, that the repeal of any statute shall not have the effect to release or extinguish any penalty or liability incurred under such statute unless the repealing act expressly so provide, would be sufficient to uphold this prosecution.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.