173 Ind. App. 243 - State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently December 2015 · most notably Spesco, Inc. v. General Electric Co. (1983), Riverside Insurance v. Pedigo (1982)
3 federal appellate · 29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gradison v. State · United States v. 25.406 Acres of Land · Van Sickle v. Kokomo Water Works Co. · Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Co. v. Gerhardt · United States v. Eden Memorial Park Ass'n
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the current cost of reproducing the property less depreciation from all sources; (2) the 'market dato' approach or value indicated by recent sales of comparable properties in the market, and (8) the 'ncome-approach,' or the value which the property's net earning power will support based upon the capitalization of net income. |”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Anything affecting the sale value [on the date of the taking] ... is a proper matter for the jury's consideration in attempting to arrive at a 'fair market value.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Irrespective of the method adopted for the ascertainment of such value, it is incumbent upon the condemnor to endeavor to reach a result that is truly 'just compensation,' that is, fair to the public as well as to the owner of the property taken. The criteria for determination of compensation and the elements which command consideration have not become unalterably fixed, and consideration must be given to the nature of the property affected and the extent of the interest acquired. 'Value' is a term which is relative in character.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bishop
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.