Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 173 Kan. 425 - State v. Pyle

State v. Pyle’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
January 1963
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Calhoun · Asbell v. State · Dobbs v. State · State v. Miller · Asbell v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"... That writ at common law (rarely used under our statutes), when no appeal or writ of error was provided by statute in criminal actions was for the purpose of reviewing questions of fact, not question of law, which existed but were unknown to the court at the time the sentence was imposed and which, if known, would have prevented the rendition of the sentence; and, if allowed, the relief granted was a new trial, not a discharge...." (pp. 426, 427.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.