Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 173 Kan. 660 - State v. Ricks

State v. Ricks’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
2
states following
July 2009
most recently cited

2 district · 56 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently July 2009 · most notably State v. Donesay (1998), 3 Kan. App. 2d 245 - American Fidelity Insurance v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co. (1979)

2 district · 56 state decisions

220195219601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Woodman · State v. Christensen · Kimminau v. Common School District No. 1 · State v. Scott · State v. Simons

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"It is true a defendant in a criminal case enjoys the. constitutional right or privilege of trial by jury. That is a personal right of which he may not be deprived against his will." State v. Ricks, 250 P.2d 773, 777 (Kan. 1952).”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"The avowed purpose and salutary provisions of the habitual criminal law as a disciplinary measure for those whom previous conviction and punishment have failed to reform were stated early in State v. Woodman, supra, and need not be repeated here." (1. c. 661.)”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““The defendant in a criminal action for felony may intelligently and affirmatively, and with the consent of the prosecuting attorney and of the trial court, waive his right to trial by a jury of twelve persons and consent to trial by a lesser number.” (Syl. 1.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.