Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 173 Md. 166 - Newton v. Johnson

Newton v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
December 2004
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 2004

10 state decisions

4019371940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dalrymple v. Gamble · York v. Maryland Trust Co. · McCrea v. Roberts · In Re Estate of Watts · Brown v. Tydings

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[I]t has been uniformly held that it is not within our province to control, or review on appeal, commissions that have been fixed by orphans’ courts within the limitations prescribed by law.” (citing authorities) Id. at 169 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.