173 Mich. App. 591 - Bowden v. McAndrew’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 1996
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1881 (Bank Protection Act of 1968) · 12 U.S.C. § 1882
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“more important than these monetary losses are the injuries and deaths often suffered by bank employees and customers during bank holdups. Law enforcement officials and innocent bystanders in the streets also sometimes fall victim to the shootings and high-speed automobile chases that follow the robbery of a financial institution. .... Clearly, the large number of injuries and deaths in 1967 indicates a pressing need for this type of legislation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“We agree [that the amendment should be applied retroactively]. In any event, using either the “substantial certainty” standard set forth in Beauchamp or the amendatory language, we believe that plaintiff’s complaint sets forth a cause of action sounding in negligence, not an intentional tort and, thus, is barred by the exclusive remedy provision of ... § 131.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“installation, maintenance, and operation of security devices and procedures ... to discourage robberies... and to assist in the identification and apprehension of persons who commit such acts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.