Russell v. Roach’s Empirical Analysis
1928
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 1961
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Crispo v. Conboy · Sons v. Sons · Howell v. Howell · Harney v. Harney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Furthermore, it is thoroughly settled that statements impugning the title of the present owner made by a former OAvner after he has parted with his title are not admissible in evidence against the present owner. Sons v. Sons, 145 Minn. 367 , 177 N. W. 498 ; Crispo v. Conboy, 153 Minn. 343 , 190 N. W. 541 , and cases cited in those cases.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Reek v. Reek
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.